TORUŃSKI ROCZNIK PODATKOWY

ISSN 2080-9573

trp header

Paweł Szwajdler
The Comparison of Internal Anti-Treaty Shopping Provisions in Switzerland, Germany and Canada

Summary

The main purpose of this paper is to analyse internal countermeasures against misuse of tax treaties. In the introduction to this article, the author presents the phenomenon of treaty shopping, which is method of tax avoidance based on network of relationships between economic entities from different countries. Furthermore, the author points out that this fiscal fraud let some entrepreneur obtain abusive tax treaty benefits. Afterwards, the author focuses on the fact, that majority of the anti- treaty shopping provisions are international but there are also internal solutions in Switzerland, Germany and Canada. Thereafter, the author lists the legal acts, which regulate above- mentioned issues. Elaborating particular anti- abusive measures, the author concentrates on identities, similarities and differences between them.

 

References

 

  1. Amoretti O., Treaty Shopping, Probleme und Mögliche Lösungen, Grinverlag 2008.
  2. Avi-Yonah R., Panayi C., Rethinking Treaty Shopping Lessons for the European Union, Public Law and Legal Theory Work Papers, Michigan University, No 182/No January 2010, 2.
  3. Brauchli B., Althanassoglou X., Missbrauch in Doppelbesteuerungsabkommens, CH-D Wirtschaft 2/2011.
  4. Clifton Fleming jr. J., Searching for the Uncertain Rationale Underlying the US Treasury’s Anti-Treaty Shopping Policy, Intertax, Volume 40, Issue 4, Kluwer Law International BV 2012.
  5. Hull H., Tax Treatment of Intra-Group Cross-Border Interest Payments Involving Switzerland, Bulletin for International Taxation August 2007.
  6. Kessler W., Treaty shopping-Quo Vadis? Kritische Anmerkungen zu § 50d Abs. 3 EStG, International Steuerrecht 2006.
  7. Kistler J., Baumann S., Hess J., Switzerland Tax Alert, Deloitte International Tax 26 August 2010.
  8. Kraft A., Sonnichsen L., Klass T., Neue Fragebogen zu § 50d Abs. 3 EStG, Latham and Watkins LLP Tax Info, nr 15, czerwiec 2012.
  9. Kraft A., Sonnischen, T. Klass, Neufassung der Anti Treaty Shopping Regelungen, Latham and Watkins LLP Tax Info nr 14, luty 2012.
  10. Locker K., Measures taken by Switzerland against the Improper Use of Double Taxation Treaties, International Bureau of Fiscal Documantation, Amsterdam 1961.
  11. Nawrot R., Szkodliwa konkurencja podatkowa, Difin 2011.
  12. Panayi C., Double Taxation, Tax Treaties, Treaty Shopping and the European Comunity, Kluwer Law International, 2007.
  13. Piltz P., Wirtschaftliche oder sonst beachtliche Gründe in § 50d Abs. 3 EStG, International Steuerrecht 2007.
  14. Reinarz P., Revised Swiss Anti-Treaty Shopping Rules, International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation Bulletin March 1999.
  15. Scholz J., Anti-Treaty-Shopping-Regelungen, EUL Verlag 2010.
  16. Sycker W., Measures taken by Switzerland against the Improper Use of Double Taxation Treaties, International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, Amsterdam 1961.
  17. Wacker R., Anti-Treaty Shopping Restrictions in the New U.S.-Netherlands Tax Treaty, 45 Tax executive 383/1993.
  18. Weyzig F. , Tax Treaty Shopping: Structural Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Routed through the Netherlands, International Tax and Public Finance December 2013, Volume 20, Issue 6.
  19. Wuermli R., Busin C., Neuerungen ab 1. Januar 1999 im Bereich des Missbrauchsbeschlusses (BRB 1962), Tax Facts 1/ 1999.

Deklaracja o wersji pierwotnej:

Redakcja „Toruńskiego Rocznika Podatkowego” informuje,  że wersją pierwotną (referencyjną) czasopisma jest wydanie elektroniczne (ISSN 2080-9573).